Jun. 28th, 2012 02:45 am
Above & Beyond

(...and more...)
Hi, LiveJournal! I went to see a show recently, and I took some photos. By the way, if you liked Above & Beyond's previous albums (Sirens of the Sea and Tri-State), you should buy their new one (Group Therapy). It's pretty good -- a lot like the previous two, but more of it.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I keep considering getting more glass, but the problem is that once you buy more glass, you start wanting a lens for every occasion, and that seems to be a very fast path to a money sinkhole... so until I strike it terribly huge, I suspect I will be still be content with what I have here.
no subject
Argh, yes, this is always happening to me. I currently have my kit 18-to-55 lens plus a 70-to-300 telephoto, which strikes me as an almost-complete lens solution. That inoffensive gap between 55 and 70 mm is way more annoying than it looks: I'm always in classrooms and things where 55 mm at f/5.6 is a bit too closed down, but 70 mm at f/4 is too telephoto. Alan solved that problem with a 50-mm f/2 prime, I think. I don't know about the price of such a lens, but it sounds like a good idea to fill the gap.
I agree that I'd also find a 16 mm pretty useless given the kit lens. The f-stop's not usually a problem for me at the wide end since I don't tend to like taking pictures wider than about 25 mm on the digital scale.
no subject
also it appears that you are enjoying a camera
yes good
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Yes, I am enjoying the camera, though as I noted above, I sort of feel as though I cheated with some of these. The originals did not look nearly as good as when I was done with them in Lightroom. (I am very glad I shot RAWs.) I sort of feel like these controls:
should actually be labeled as:
Some of the images I did 'real work' on (I'll upload the originals at some point) to get better results out of; but really, Lightroom is truly amazing...
no subject
no subject